Trust and transparency
Editorial and scientific review policy.
How SciPhys keeps instrument-analysis content sourced, bounded and reviewable.
Last updated · August 5, 2026
Who writes
SciPhys articles are produced by the SciPhys Research Team. We use an organization byline because the work combines product research, technical documentation and editorial review rather than attributing expertise to an invented individual.
Source hierarchy
We prioritize primary research papers, standards bodies, official scientific organizations and first-party technical documentation. References are linked at the claim or section level and collected in a source list.
Scientific review
A methods review checks whether the article separates observation from interpretation, states assumptions, exposes uncertainty and avoids presenting a database match or model output as independent experimental proof.
AI-assisted work
AI may assist with outlining, translation, copy editing and illustration. Generated illustrations are reviewed for scientific plausibility and clearly captioned as illustrations; they are never presented as experimental data. Claims still require source or experimental support.
Product statements
Product capabilities are described as workflow functions or design goals. They do not imply autonomous scientific validation, regulatory approval or a substitute for calibration, reference databases and qualified domain review.
Updates and corrections
Articles display published and modified dates. Material corrections should update the page and its review record. Readers can report an error to hello@sciphys.ai with the page URL and supporting source.